TaxonFlow Co-Pilot

Elenia · Class 7.1

1234
Back to project

Co-Pilot · 07:31

I've extracted 32 potential facts from Elenia - Toiminnallisuusselostus_päivittyvä.docx. Please review and confirm the ones below.

You

You · 08:42

They are now confirmed, how to proceed?

Co-Pilot · 08:42

Great, all 32 facts are now confirmed! Let me review the current state of the assessment and identify the most important gaps.

Current Status Overview

Based on the confirmed facts, here's where we stand:

✅ Well-covered areas:

  • DNSH 7.1 (Climate mitigation / Energy) – Very comprehensive
  • DNSH 7.2 (Climate adaptation) – Core facts confirmed
  • DNSH 7.3 (Water) – Basic fixture selection confirmed
  • DNSH 7.4 (Circular economy) – Contaminated soil management confirmed
  • DNSH 7.5 (Pollution) – Soil and groundwater facts confirmed
  • DNSH 7.6 (Biodiversity) – Site prior use confirmed

🔴 Highest Priority Gaps

SC-7.1-01 – Substantial Contribution (Construction of new buildings)

This is the most critical criterion — the building must pass SC to qualify at all. The key missing facts are:

  1. Primary Energy Demand (PED) value — What is the calculated or target kWh/m²/year for primary energy? This must be at least 10% below the national Nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) threshold.
  2. Gross Floor Area (GFA) — Required for the project record and PED calculations.
  3. Municipality / location — Needed to confirm applicable nZEB reference values (Pirkkala is mentioned — shall I record this?).
  4. Building permit date — Required to determine which nZEB thresholds apply.

Shall we start with these SC gaps?

Can you confirm or provide:
- What is the target or calculated PED value (kWh/m²/year)?
- What is the gross floor area of the building?
- And shall I record Pirkkala as the municipality from the confirmed facts?

You

You · 08:43

Can you still make me a report and fill the gaps later?

Co-Pilot · 08:43

Absolutely! Here's a draft assessment report for Elenia (Project 1234) based on all confirmed facts. Gaps are clearly marked for follow-up.


EU Taxonomy Assessment Report

Elenia Campus — Project 1234

Draft — Pending completion


Project Details

Field Value
Project Name Elenia Campus
Project Number 1234
Municipality Pirkkala (to be confirmed)
Taxonomy Class 7.1-01 – Construction of new buildings
Gross Floor Area ⚠️ Not yet provided
Building Permit Date ⚠️ Not yet provided
Construction Start Date ⚠️ Not yet provided

Taxonomy Classification

Activity: 7.1-01 – Construction of new buildings
Objective: Climate Change Mitigation (CCM)


Substantial Contribution (SC)

SC-7.1-01: Energy Performance

The building must demonstrate a Primary Energy Demand (PED) at least 10% below the national nZEB threshold applicable at the time of building permit.

Criterion Status Evidence
nZEB threshold reference ⚠️ Pending — depends on permit date and GFA
Target PED (kWh/m²/year) ⚠️ Not yet provided
10% below nZEB threshold ⚠️ Cannot be verified until PED and threshold confirmed
EU Taxonomy energy threshold ✅ Confirmed -10% kynnysarvo EU-taksonomian vaatimuksen mukaisesti

Action required: Provide target PED value and building permit date to verify SC compliance.


Do No Significant Harm (DNSH)

DNSH 7.1 — Climate Change Mitigation (Energy Performance)

Criterion Status Evidence
Energy performance target E-luku tavoite vähintään B-luokka
EU Taxonomy energy threshold -10% kynnysarvo
Heating system Maalämpö päälämmönlähteenä, sähkökattila huipputehoja varten
Cooling system Jäähdytys tuotetaan osana maalämpöjärjestelmää
Demand-controlled ventilation Tarpeenmukainen säätö ilmanvaihdossa, lämmityksessä, jäähdytyksessä ja valaistuksessa
Heat recovery efficiency Tavoitellaan parasta mahdollista lämmöntalteenoton hyötysuhdetta
SFP value SFP-luku alle 1,8 kW/m³/s
Airtightness test Ilmatiiveysmittaus suoritetaan
Thermal imaging Lämpökuvaus suoritetaan
Building automation Rakennusautomaatiojärjestelmä valvomolla, alakeskuksilla ja huonesäätimillä
Lighting control DALI-väylään liitetyt liike-/läsnäolotunnitsimet
Indoor climate target Toimisto- ja neuvottelutilat S2; CO2-ohjaus S1-luokan rajoihin
Metering system Kattava mittarointijärjestelmä
Renewable energy (solar) Aurinkopaneelijärjestelmälle varattu liityntäpiste ja nousukaapelireitti

DNSH 7.2 — Climate Change Adaptation

Criterion Status Evidence
Heating design temperature -29°C
Stormwater management 1 m³ viivästyssäiliö / 180 m² katto- ja päällystepinta-alaa
Flood resilience grading Maanpinnat muotoiltu rakennuksesta poispäin, min. kaltevuus 1:20 / 3 m
Climate risk assessment ⚠️ Not yet confirmed

Action required: Confirm whether a formal climate risk and vulnerability assessment (CRVA) has been or will be conducted per Annex A of the Taxonomy.


DNSH 7.3 — Sustainable Use and Protection of Water

Criterion Status Evidence
Water fixtures selection Valitaan EU-taksonomia ja BREEAM-tavoitteet huomioiden
Specific fixture flow rates ⚠️ Not yet confirmed

Action required: Confirm specific flow rates or fixture classes (e.g., EU water label class A or equivalent) for toilets, taps, and showers.


DNSH 7.4 — Transition to Circular Economy

Criterion Status Evidence
Contaminated soil management Arseenipitoinen täyttömaa toimitetaan soveltuvalle maankaatopaikalle
Construction waste management plan ⚠️ Not yet confirmed
Design for deconstruction ⚠️ Not yet confirmed

Action required: Confirm whether a construction waste management plan exists and whether the building is designed for disassembly/deconstruction.


DNSH 7.5 — Pollution Prevention and Control

Criterion Status Evidence
Groundwater zone Alue ei sijaitse luokitellulla pohjavesialueella
Groundwater infiltration Hulevesiä ei merkittävissä määrin voi imeyttää perusmaahan
Kitchen wastewater Viemäröidään rasvanerottimen kautta
Soil contamination Yhdessä näytteessä arseenin kynnysarvon ylitys (P12); muut pisteet ok

DNSH 7.6 — Biodiversity and Ecosystems

Criterion Status Evidence
Site prior use Entistä metsämaata, täytetty moottoritien rakentamisen yhteydessä 2005–2020
Biodiversity/habitat assessment ⚠️ Not yet confirmed
Site not on sensitive land ⚠️ Not yet confirmed

Action required: Confirm that the site is not on ecologically sensitive land (primary forest, protected areas, etc.) and whether any biodiversity impact assessment has been conducted.


Minimum Social Safeguards (MS)

Criterion Status Evidence
Human rights / OECD due diligence ⚠️ Not yet confirmed
ILO core labour standards ⚠️ Not yet confirmed

Action required: Confirm that the developer/investor applies OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.


Summary of Open Actions

# Area Action Required Priority
1 SC-7.1-01 Provide target PED value (kWh/m²/year) 🔴 Critical
2 SC-7.1-01 Provide gross floor area 🔴 Critical
3 SC-7.1-01 Confirm building permit date 🔴 Critical
4 DNSH 7.2 Confirm climate risk & vulnerability assessment (CRVA) 🟠 High
5 DNSH 7.3 Confirm fixture flow rates / water label classes 🟠 High
6 DNSH 7.4 Confirm construction waste management plan 🟠 High
7 DNSH 7.4 Confirm design for deconstruction approach 🟡 Medium
8 DNSH 7.6 Confirm site not on sensitive/protected land 🟠 High
9 DNSH 7.6 Confirm biodiversity impact assessment 🟡 Medium
10 MS Confirm social safeguards / due diligence 🟡 Medium

Report generated by TaxonFlow Co-Pilot — Draft status. All confirmed facts are based on consultant-verified project documentation.


Would you like to start working through any of the open actions now, or save this and return later?

You

You · 08:44

Why the preview button does not work?

Co-Pilot · 08:44

I'm just an AI assistant — I don't have access to the TaxonFlow application interface, buttons, or any frontend features. I can only assist with the content of the EU Taxonomy assessment itself through this conversation.

For technical issues like a non-working preview button, I'd recommend:

  • Contacting TaxonFlow support directly
  • Checking if there's a help/bug report option in the application menu
  • Trying a browser refresh or different browser as a quick first step

Is there anything else I can help you with on the assessment itself? 😊

Co-Pilot assists with evidence collection. Taxonomy criteria are validated by the Rule Engine.